Avatar
Plenipotentiary-at-large
Quest
I use the foams that come shipped with the Eheim units or coarse pre-filters like those used for pond systems or the ones that ship with Penguin reverse-flow power heads. Can use finer/denser foam but then one has to make sure that they get rinsed regularly (every 1-2 weeks) or they will generally clog and collapse. It only takes a couple minutes and is much preferable to breaking down the whole unit.
Regarding "waste", my theory is that bacteria never sleep and that most of what is available for vacuuming once every week or two is already spent in terms of what it can contribute to nitrogen chemistry.
As an aside, the faster the flow rate the less time the bacteria has to do it's work. The Eheim wet-dry units actually briefly hold the water between outflows and are reported to be around 70% more efficient at breaking down nitrites. As such I'm inclined to view flow rate as a relative rather than absolute measure of filtration efficiency, that is, a filter can move a lot of water but that doesn't imply that it purifies it as well or completely as something that has a lower flow-rate but provides a better/longer interface between the bacteria and water-borne waste.
Occurs to me that if processed waste was actually an issue that the matten/Poret filters that are cut to fit the whole width of a tank and that need only be cleaned once a year would be fatal to the fish since they get completely impregnated with sludge over time. Not saying the stuff is an asset or that "cleaner" isn't better, but I really think that it (brown stuff/particulates) is of little consequence or concern if filtration is otherwise adequate.
I use the foams that come shipped with the Eheim units or coarse pre-filters like those used for pond systems or the ones that ship with Penguin reverse-flow power heads. Can use finer/denser foam but then one has to make sure that they get rinsed regularly (every 1-2 weeks) or they will generally clog and collapse. It only takes a couple minutes and is much preferable to breaking down the whole unit.
Regarding "waste", my theory is that bacteria never sleep and that most of what is available for vacuuming once every week or two is already spent in terms of what it can contribute to nitrogen chemistry.
As an aside, the faster the flow rate the less time the bacteria has to do it's work. The Eheim wet-dry units actually briefly hold the water between outflows and are reported to be around 70% more efficient at breaking down nitrites. As such I'm inclined to view flow rate as a relative rather than absolute measure of filtration efficiency, that is, a filter can move a lot of water but that doesn't imply that it purifies it as well or completely as something that has a lower flow-rate but provides a better/longer interface between the bacteria and water-borne waste.
Occurs to me that if processed waste was actually an issue that the matten/Poret filters that are cut to fit the whole width of a tank and that need only be cleaned once a year would be fatal to the fish since they get completely impregnated with sludge over time. Not saying the stuff is an asset or that "cleaner" isn't better, but I really think that it (brown stuff/particulates) is of little consequence or concern if filtration is otherwise adequate.