• You liked BFD7 now you should join this forum and of course become a club member to see what CCA is all about.
  • Thank you to everyone who registered and showed up for the BIG Fish Deal #7.

Geological Game Changer: New study shakes up understanding of when continents connect

dogofwar

CCA Members
http://www.lsu.edu/ur/ocur/lsunews/MediaCenter/News/2015/06/item76541.html

Until recently, most geologists had determined the land connecting North and South America, the Isthmus of Panama, had formed 3.5 million years ago.
But new data shows that this geological event, which dramatically changed the world, occurred much earlier. In a comprehensive biological study, researchers have confirmed this new information by showing that plants and animals had been migrating between the continents nearly 30 million years earlier.

This means the best-dated geological event we ever had is wrong, said Prosanta Chakrabarty, LSU Associate Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences and Curator of Ichthyology at the LSU Museum of Natural Science. His research on the evolution of freshwater and marine organisms in Central America was part of the study with colleagues at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, American Museum of Natural History and University of Gothenburg, which included living and extinct mammals, birds, plants, fish and invertebrate animals published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The researchers found large pulses of movement among these plants and animals between North and South America from 41 million, 23 million and eight million years ago. These coordinated spikes in migration imply that geological changes in Central America, such as landmass formation and new freshwater corridors, were aiding migration for many kinds of plants and animals.

Before, South America was thought of as an island with no communication until 3.5 million years, so the only way to explain such high biodiversity was to say that it accumulated extremely fast. Now, with a longer history, we know that processes and patterns took a lot of time to form, said Christine Bacon, lead author of the study and associate researcher at the University of Gothenburg. Our results change our understanding of the biodiversity and climate, both at the regional and global levels.
 
During the last and previous ice ages, the land bridge was much broader to include Caribbean Islands and this is why you find similar species of cichlid and live bearers in both CA and caribbean islands. Cuban and Haitian cichlid are so closely related to CAs that they will readily cross breed. The meteorite impact crater that killed off the dinosaur 65 million years ago is just off Yucatan Pininsula now hidden beneath the Caribbean sea.
 

Aquanero

Members
I can easily see that over time with the drifting of continents, raising and lowering of sea leaves the north and south american land masses could have been connected and separated several times before today's configuration. Interesting post Matt.
 

neut

Members
Link wouldn't work for me, maybe a temporary issue. So don't know date of article linked above or details therein, but this was reported a few years ago: link.

The objections of geologist Tony Coates, mentioned in the article, appear to me to largely be based on molecular/genetic dating. Problem with that is, despite it's widespread use, this molecular dating method is fraught with issues... another big subject in itself, but just one sample reference:
http://www.somosbacteriasyvirus.com/wrong.pdf
Dates from the molecular clock: how wrong can we be?
Large discrepancies have been found in dates of evolutionary events obtained using the molecular clock. Twofold differences have been reported between the dates estimated from molecular data and those from the fossil record; furthermore, different molecular methods can give dates that differ 20-fold.
Again, this is just one sample of many such references that could be cited. The point being that attempting to date geologic or biologic events based on molecular dating methods (changes in DNA or proteins, etc.) can be a pretty tenuous affair. Can't say I've studied much of the history of theory regarding the Panama land bridge, but if earlier theory was based largely on molecular dating of species, then it's no wonder if they got it wrong.
 
Last edited:
Top