davidhusker
Members
On the website they have Lake Victoria and Lake Kivu under Division B, non-rift lake old worlds. When in fact they are rift lake cichlids...
Aquafest 2009 show classes.. question
This is true.
I believe it was put in the Non because it was a smaller group.
Not positive. I took the list from the last Aquafest and then added all the non-cichlids to it.
I believe it was put in the Non because it was a smaller group.
Not positive. I took the list from the last Aquafest and then added all the non-cichlids to it.
dogofwar
CCA Members
Lake victoria isn't technically a rift lake and was formed quite differently than Malawi and tanganyika
That said, it's in east Africa vs. West Africa
There's a good article on cichlid-forum about the great lakes of east Africa
Another question:
Cichlasoma is currently used for only the acaras (many of which were aequidens)
Would true cichlasoma (eg ports) go in aequidens class or cichlasoma class (with fish that used to be cichlasoma but are now nandopsis, Heros, australoheros, archocentrus, etc)?
Posted via mobile.capitalcichlids.org
That said, it's in east Africa vs. West Africa
There's a good article on cichlid-forum about the great lakes of east Africa
Another question:
Cichlasoma is currently used for only the acaras (many of which were aequidens)
Would true cichlasoma (eg ports) go in aequidens class or cichlasoma class (with fish that used to be cichlasoma but are now nandopsis, Heros, australoheros, archocentrus, etc)?
Posted via mobile.capitalcichlids.org
